Over 59029
politifake

Gi Politics


OR OPTION "B" - COME DOWN WITH A 2 MONTH CASE OF LARYNGITIS


TAGS: mitt romney gaffe fail laryngitis
Rating: 2.7/5

More politifakes by marms

GrouchoMarxist - December 28, 2013, 1:12 pm
Remember when he said, "If you like your plan you can keep it"?
fauxnews - September 21, 2012, 3:59 pm
Great point, mate. Romney lies in public and then says how he really feels in private. Tell me again why should trust him when he knows the cameras are rolling? Rubbish
HRoark - September 21, 2012, 3:43 pm
I would like for you to demonstrate how Obama is looking our for me. In context, Romney wasn't worried about getting their votes. Earlier this year he said the poor have a safety net and that he needs to worry about the middle class.
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 7:51 pm
TRANSLATION: It hurts my feelings when you are right and I am wrong. Time for a good'ole red herring. Here's hoping no one will notice my lame attempt to change the subject with a distraction, albeit a lame one. Here goes nothing! *prays*
arnnatz - September 20, 2012, 7:46 pm
His job is not president. His job is to try to get the presidency for now. Obama's job is supposed to be president, but he can't stay away from golf and partying with celebs.
GrouchoMarxist - September 20, 2012, 7:27 pm
Isreal will always be a friend of Isreal.... Those guys LOL
romneyisatool - September 20, 2012, 5:44 pm
You're a liar, mate. He didn't say that. EXACT QUOTE:“47 percent of the people”will vote for Obama “no matter what.”“My job is not to worry about those people." He's running for President. The job of President is care about ALL America.Not just his voters
HRoark - September 20, 2012, 5:13 pm
Those of us with jobs and that create jobs remember it! Besides, what is wrong with stating the truth, he didn't say they don't matter, he said they will probably vote to maintain not paying income tax.
fauxnews - September 20, 2012, 12:12 pm
Nope mate. Neither does anyone else. They are too preoccupied with Romney's "47% of America doesn't matter" gaffe to care. (chuckle)
GrouchoMarxist - September 20, 2012, 8:13 am
Remember when he said, "You didn't build this?"


Democrat Robert C. Byrd -




SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT - As a former Starfleet Science Officer I can offer scientific and logical solutions to the problems we now face


TAGS: spock presodent science logical solutions
Rating: 4.93/5

More politifakes by Budog

RonaldReagan - January 12, 2014, 2:26 pm
Funny. Nimoy would actually work.


you mean to tell me -




"LITTLE BUDDY!" - If Romney is the millionaire, and Paul Ryan is Gilligan, then no wonder no one ever gets off that damn island!


TAGS: gilligan paul ryan funny poster
Rating: 2.79/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

marms - September 20, 2012, 11:18 pm
Woot!


My Contribution To Tree-Hugging, Vegetarian Liberals -




PSYCHOPATH -




LIBERAL LOGIC - Kinda like Circular logic (minus the logic part)


TAGS: liblogic
Rating: 4.52/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 17, 2012, 9:38 pm
its the blueprint for a lot of hacks here!
funnyguy88 - October 17, 2012, 12:34 pm
I love it !! nice work Galt.


RELIGIOUS FREEDOM - Some people define it in a bizarre way.


TAGS: religious freedom glbt rights
Rating: 1.98/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Pikeman - November 5, 2015, 6:33 am
What liberals want to do to anyone that disagrees with their insanity.
RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:50 am
Indiana anyone? Indiana Jones has announced today he plans to change his first name to Kentucky
Renza - February 13, 2013, 10:20 pm
LoL, that is hilarious, and a sad amount of truth to it.


Draft-Dodger Trump Said Sleeping Around Was My ‘Personal Vietnam’ -




WTF happened to us? -


TAGS: mansies pansy girly men
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by JGalt

RonaldReagan - May 3, 2015, 9:46 am
Made True Grit with one lung. How you do it. No whining. Don't make them like they used to.
JGalt - January 7, 2014, 6:34 am
like the new mayor of NYC? In the 1940s, the mayor of NYC asked people to help shovel snow to keep sidewalks and intersections clear.... Last week the Nannyork City Mayor said to stay inside because you could die.. Sheesh.
OTC - January 6, 2014, 12:15 pm
In a word, 'liberalism'


OBAMA HOOD -


TAGS: obama hood rob from the rich give to the poor
Rating: 3.7/5

More politifakes by Chillax

HSHendy - September 16, 2012, 11:08 pm
Robin Hood would be a republican not a democrate. He took from the over taxing fat cat king Jon and gave back to the poor taxpayer, his subjects.


SCIENCE VS RELIGION - One will fly you into space, the other will fly you into a building.


TAGS: religion science rationality
Rating: 3.28/5

More politifakes by Cadaver

kellyvanrijn - May 12, 2014, 11:58 am
The title should have been: Science vs Islam. Jews, Christians and Buddhists do not fly planes into buildings.
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:34 pm
...but I know you didnt mean anything homophobic by that. I dont blame you for not wanting to be mistakened for one of them.Who would want to be one of THOSE homophobic losers.But you have nothing to worry about,it's not like you're one of them,right? X-D
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:31 pm
Gee, OTC...I wish Arnnatz and StoneTools would've figured that out before running away from here like cowards, after getting banned TWICE for making homophobic remarks. Must make them mad that I can keep posting here while they can't. Such a shame...
OTC - February 1, 2014, 8:58 pm
Theatre uh? Always figured you to be a member of Film Actors Guild (F.A.G.)
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:27 pm
Curious,Arnnatz..what else would you'think' I thought you said? Do you really think I would expect YOU of all people to compliment me on this forum by calling me"a Jedi"(lol)? Are you really (A)that dumb or (B)that desperate?Cant wait to hear this one lol
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:20 pm
In theatre, a "farce" is a comedy that aims at entertaining the audience through situations that are highly exaggerated,extravagant,and thus improbable.Which is totally me on this forum.So,trust me. I knew what you meant.Have you seen my avatar lately?
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:18 pm
*pfft* Whatever..I totally knew what you mean.haha..Are you serious? You really can't be that dumb. Do you even know what "farce" means? You're grasping for straws now.lol
OTC - January 31, 2014, 5:32 pm
Translation(fauxnews/sophia): I didn't realize it said farce, I need to start projecting big time!
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 3:57 pm
Nah, doesn't suck at all. Why would I edit it? Taking this place too seriously and being pathologically insecure is your thing, Arnnatz. I can make a joke, even poke fun at myself, and not get b-utthurt over it like you do. Must "suck" that you can't,huh?
OTC - January 31, 2014, 3:42 pm
must suck not being able to edit your admitting that you are a farce
OTC - January 30, 2014, 5:33 pm
rofl, glad you agree!
fauxnews - January 30, 2014, 11:03 am
It is indeed, OTC. It is indeed.
OTC - January 30, 2014, 9:58 am
But the farce is strong with you.
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 9:24 pm
Prepare for your mind to be blown...I don't believe in God AND I care a lot about what happens to others AND I don't like liberals. Want to see my next magic trick?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:47 pm
Terrorists claim religion but they are not religious, even though they may think they are. I've never killed for Jesus. Mohammed would be turning in his grave if he knew what people are doing in his name.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:45 pm
These cold heart killers don't believe in god so they don't care about what they do to people. I believe in God and I care for everyone. You sound like you don't believe in God you probably could care less what happens to other people.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:44 pm
It isn't superstition. Science says I should be dead Science says my truck hit a tree. When in fact my vehicle held the road better than it ever did. My comment about religion in school isn't about stopping a bullet. It's about people caring more for life
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:35 pm
Your superstition wouldn't prevent that tragedy from happening anymore than me using the force will control people's minds. See??? I just tried, again. Jessica Alba still won't sleep with me. The force is weak with this one.....:-p
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:32 pm
???? How does prayer stop a bullet? Remind me again?? In fact, wouldn't that just incite fanatics who hate that religion to come into the school and attack enemies of that religion? Schools should be a religion free zone for a reason...common sense.
OTC - January 28, 2014, 5:22 pm
They flew into a building using science, so you're saying they are both evil?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 3:29 am
No where does the bible say God says to kill innocent people. Frankly if we had prayer in school we wouldn't have so many senseless killings. Just last night a family of 3 was sh** and killed in a home invasion in my home town Ashtabula Ohio.


FERENGI RULES OF ACQUISITION - The rules give the Ferengi license to cheat, steal, and bend the truth to suit their needs. I think the Star Trek writers stole these from the Democratic playbook!


TAGS: plagiarism
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

crankyhead - October 12, 2013, 7:52 pm
We could add you to the previously stated list, I suppose...
JGalt - October 12, 2013, 9:26 am
You have a list there too, to share with us foil-hat man?
crankyhead - October 11, 2013, 10:58 am
Groucho and Arnnatz, to name a couple. =)
StoneTools - October 11, 2013, 10:43 am
Oh, yeah? Name them
crankyhead - October 11, 2013, 10:28 am
You understand that there are plenty of 'no-information' voters on welfare who have been voting republican their whole lives, right?
JGalt - October 11, 2013, 6:54 am
not the democratic version- degradation into low information voters that want medals and raises for simply showing up for work (the more highly evolved ones that are not yet devolved into welfare collectors
crankyhead - October 10, 2013, 4:46 am
No. Only people like arnnatz don't believe in evolution.
StoneTools - October 7, 2013, 8:08 pm
Sometimes? Don't you mean most of the time or always?
OTC - October 7, 2013, 2:55 pm
ST, don't pay any attention to cranky, his mind wonders and sometimes, it leaves completely.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 7, 2013, 7:49 am

quack
StoneTools - October 7, 2013, 12:01 am
As I previously stated, very juvenile
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 6, 2013, 7:44 pm

Duckling.
OTC - October 6, 2013, 7:24 pm
If you'd been here for more than a minute, you'd know that answer.
StoneTools - October 6, 2013, 4:52 pm
Wow! Juvenile?!? Have you looked at your postings on this page? Talk about juvenile. Freaking hypocrite!
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 6, 2013, 4:48 pm

Juvenile. Do you believe in evolution OTC?
StoneTools - October 6, 2013, 4:39 pm
I take it that means you don't believe in evolution, cranky?!
crankyhead - October 6, 2013, 2:53 pm
Only an idiot wouldn't. =)
OTC - October 6, 2013, 2:52 pm
And don't think of the English langauge being bastardized, think of it as "evolving", liberals believe in evolution, right?
crankyhead - October 6, 2013, 2:50 pm
I love it when ToneStools would rather act like a bigoted xenophobe and insult foreign countries, than remain on topic. I'm sad that Arnnatz isn't here to witness it.
OTC - October 6, 2013, 2:50 pm
If they were thrown out, they had to migrate somewhere.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 7:21 pm

BTW, the Acadians were thrown out, they didn't exactly "migrate". Best thing the British ever did for Canada.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 5:52 pm

You won't get any argument from me regarding the french messing with the English language, but no, that's not who I was referring to specifically.
OTC - October 5, 2013, 5:10 pm
That sounds like Cajun talk, you know, those French-Acadians who migrated from Canada to Louisiana? That must be who mooo is talking about basterdizing the English language
Scramblus - October 5, 2013, 2:26 pm
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tangent
OTC - October 5, 2013, 1:53 pm
Let me done told you sumtin, he done go show himself as a narcissistic liberal, that be expected I garuntee
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 11:38 am
Or maybe it's coming from your basement. Is it time for you to bre***feed cranky again?
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 11:34 am
And where did you HEAR this? Is there sound on the site somewhere? Or are you suffering from auditory hallucinations?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 11:08 am

All I heard was "Quack, Quack"
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:36 am
You might want to go back and read the drivel you post. You'll notice that you don't understand a majority of what's written on this site. Maybe you should find a French speaking site.
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:35 am
That's probably a good idea, she might be able to dummy it down to something you can actually understand.
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:33 am
you as an ignorant cow or a b***hurt liberal, or whatever I want as long as I don't go over the line. It's my choice, my right, my keyboard. Don't like it, suck it up skippy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 10:33 am

Silly duck
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:31 am
The problem with your ignorant statement is that you can and have labeled me with all sorts of things, you can label me a conservative, a communist, an anarchist, a french fry, or whatever. I don't care, it's just a label. By the same token, I can label
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 10:30 am

I'm so sorry that I don't understand the meaning of the nonsense that you rant on about. Maybe explain it to me in 'merican and I'll ask my 4 year old niece to translate for me.
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:28 am
What's retarded is a supposed adult not recognizing sarcasm. Sorry, was that word too big for you mooo?
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:21 am
What's really dimwitted is you not understanding the meaning when I stated "In Canadian" and then floundering around trying to defend your ignorance. You really are a funny guy.
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:17 am
but, then again, certain people on here wouldn't understand why it has moooo and cow in the same sentence
StoneTools - October 5, 2013, 10:12 am
That would be a good title for a kid's book: "Moooo" said the angry cow
JGalt - October 5, 2013, 8:00 am
wow 1776 was a long time ago, get over it.
JGalt - October 5, 2013, 7:54 am
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dialog
Scramblus - October 5, 2013, 3:37 am
Ah childish "NO U" replies now, this is getting embarrassing.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 1:23 am

No shocker you can"t spell Honour, since you don't understand the word.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 1:21 am

Also, your example is just proof of how your country has bastardized the English language. like all the words you folks can't spell...or pronounce. Probably not something you want to flaunt all over the place.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 5, 2013, 1:17 am

You're arguing semantics when you know d*** well what the point was, or do you? . Let your pet fight his own battle, you can clean up his mess later. Try finding an example that isn't British slang, find an example in "Canadian".
OTC - October 5, 2013, 12:23 am
Same language, different meanings, and all you see is 'same thing'?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 11:37 pm

Yep, same thing....You really are simple. You should be glad they make you wear that helmet, you've clearly forgotten a few times and fallen off.
OTC - October 4, 2013, 11:13 pm
You are wrong skippy, the government won't let me ride the Harley without a helmet.
OTC - October 4, 2013, 11:10 pm
Really? Fag in England means something different than in the U.S., yet, same language (English), totally different meanings. Thanks for playing.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 11:10 pm

well gee wiz opie...I get the connection yer trying to make, it's just the wrong one. They're never gonna let you ride the bus without your helmet at this rate.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 11:06 pm

It's the same language, Words don't mean different things...Huh y'all?
OTC - October 4, 2013, 10:54 pm
In that case, you should have made the connection with cow and mooo
OTC - October 4, 2013, 10:53 pm
So you are saying Canucks don't have a different vernacular, eh?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 9:34 pm

Duck.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 9:33 pm

liberal based on what they say ( #60484), but no one can a**ume ST is a conservative based on what he says? (many, many forum posts and comments, he's not going to deny it, he's done it repeatedly)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 9:31 pm

I wasn't criticizing his spelling or grammar, I rarely do that. I was criticizing his statement and denying it's validity, something I often do. That was your a**umption. What's next? the part where ST explains why he can a**ume that someone is a....
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 9:10 pm

"In Canadian" is his childish way of saying that Canadians speak a different language than Americans, and that's retarded. Are you saying he meant it A different way?
OTC - October 4, 2013, 8:22 pm
"in Canadian" is not retarded in the context that it was written, obviously, you don't understand what ST wrote so keep reading the entire sentence, maybe it will come to you
OTC - October 4, 2013, 8:17 pm
A "surprised form" of what? Everyone makes unintentional mistakes, so why point them out? Don't like it? Don't dish it out. And our government doesn't work very well if a tinpan like Obama can do what he has been doing and get away with it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 8:12 pm

Everyone makes spelling mistakes...but "in Canadian" is just retarded. not surprised form a couple of ignorant american rednecks. How's that government of yours working out for ya? Maybe start practicing your Mandarin.
OTC - October 4, 2013, 8:01 pm
Oh lookie, the grammar cop who can't even spell hypocrisy is trying to correct ST
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 7:46 pm
Thanks, the team I'm coaching is about at your mental capacity, they are 8 and 9 year olds. You'd fit right in with them.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 6:17 pm

"in Canadian" You really are the most dimwitted person I've ever encountered. Good luck at your little league game this weekend.
JGalt - October 4, 2013, 5:27 pm
I guess I am not the only one who recognizes what's going on here.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 5:22 pm
maybe mooo in canadian means small child with major brain impairment. And their cows don't speak english and say something different like, as you stated, "oink"
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 5:18 pm
See there, that's a liberal response and is referred to as putting words in someone's mouth. I never said not declaring an allegiance meant you were a liberal. But, please do go on, you're an amusing clown at the very least.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 5:15 pm
apparently you haven't reached third grade comprehension yet, that explains why you were confused by the moooo and cow comparison.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 5:14 pm
If the drivel you post here is what you consider contributions, you are a bigger fool than I thought you were, if that's even possible.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 4:49 pm

I didn't a**ume you'd know, I knew you wouldn't. You really do read at a 3rd grade level don't you? No shocker that you know what sounds farm animals make.
OTC - October 4, 2013, 4:43 pm
"I contribute all over the network." Well, that explains the glitches.
OTC - October 4, 2013, 4:28 pm
In other words, you don't know and as$umed I should know yours. Why do you as$ume I would care where your nic came from? Stop eating crayons from your coloring book and you would know cows go mooooooooooooo
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 4:02 pm

Keeping in mind that you ARE a conservative but you're afraid to climb down from the fence you built under yourself.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 4:00 pm

I contribute all over the network. Try again. Let's get back to where you a**ume someone is a liberal because they don't declare an allegiance but no one can a**ume you're a conservative when you do the same thing. Mr duck?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:29 pm
See your comment #60501. But it's different when you say it, huh mooo? Where's your contribution? Or are you just a convenient bre*** for cranky to suckle?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:27 pm
Are you?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:17 pm
Moooo, you should probably wait until your 13th birthday before you leave the playground and come on here.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 3:16 pm

Does it relate to the history of the network? Are you a member that actually contributes anything of value? Or just a whiny child with a pet stone tools?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:15 pm
Yes, your nick and your opinions are totally valueless. Thank you for admitting it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 3:14 pm

Exactly. Your valueless opinion. Glad you understand.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:10 pm
Yeah, invalid a**umptions. What's your handle? Mooooooooooo. What's a cow say? Mooooooooooo. Now what do they have in common?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 3:09 pm
Why would anyone care where your nick came from or what your opinion is? I think cow is pretty appropriate, but then that's just my opinion
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 2:54 pm

Why would anyone care?
OTC - October 4, 2013, 2:51 pm
Pot, meet kettle
OTC - October 4, 2013, 1:51 pm
Ok genius, I guess you have been here more than a minute? Where'd my nic come from, mmm? That's what I thought
OTC - October 4, 2013, 1:48 pm
I guess his Fisher Price See-N-Say was broken and he heard the farmer say 'The cow says, oink'?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 1:47 pm

If you'd been here more than a minute you'd know where my nic came from. Alas, you're just temporary cookie cutter replacements for the last group of ignorant children.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 1:45 pm

You guys are hilarious. When did I ever say I was a cow? You really shouldn't make a**umptions like that. (This is pure gold from kids like you two, keep it up)
OTC - October 4, 2013, 1:42 pm
I know a farmer who raises cattle, he says cows are one of the dumbest animals to deal with. 'The cow says- mooooooooo'
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 1:23 pm
lol
OTC - October 4, 2013, 1:17 pm
A cow is calling you a duck?
OTC - October 4, 2013, 1:15 pm
Probably will have to bre***feed since WIC is not getting funded thru the shutdown
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 12:52 pm
I do hate it though when I have to bring the comments down to your level mooo
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 12:52 pm

"Childish taunts" there you go projecting again Mr duck.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 12:50 pm
No, seriously, mooo, shouldn't you be bre***feeding cranky about now instead of posting childish taunts?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 12:47 pm
did that comment even make sense to you before you hit post reply?
Scramblus - October 4, 2013, 12:27 pm
I'm not really how sure "you're posts are ban and you should feel bad" is liberal. I'm pretty sure I'd feel the same whereever on the political spectrum I was.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 11:56 am

Anything but an explaination of your hipocrisy as usual Mr duck. No big surprise there.
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 9:27 am
I'm surprised you came here mooo, shouldn't you be at home bre***-feeding cranky?
StoneTools - October 4, 2013, 9:23 am
The mighty mooo has spoken. All hail mooo, the dear leader of the left.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 8:18 am

You're the Duck.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2013, 8:17 am

That's rich coming from you. You only criticize liberals and refuse to admit you're a conservative and then make a**umptions about others...do you even read what you type from up on that fence?


For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. -


TAGS: liberty politics religious freedom
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

RonaldReagan - May 5, 2015, 4:22 pm
True


More Liberal Logic Gone Wild -


TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 4.82/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 1:18 pm
Repeating the lie does not make it true. but liberals hate the truth it stands in the way of the agenda.
birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 5:25 pm
That poster is very inaccurate. very inaccurate.
JGalt - August 27, 2014, 12:39 am
https://www.billwhittle.com/speaking/david-horowitz-freedom-center-palm-beach-fl
Zeitguy - August 26, 2014, 12:56 am
A true display of the idiocracy of political pundintsy.


Give it a rest -


TAGS: give it a rest
Rating: 4.23/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

RonaldReagan - December 15, 2013, 9:59 am
Offensive. He was still someone's child.


OBAMA SUPPORTER - 140 Pounds of Pure Unadulterated Emotion. Not an Ounce of Logic.


TAGS: obama supporter obamabots emo no logic
Rating: 3.91/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

RonaldReagan - January 9, 2014, 5:44 pm
Obummer. Look at those arms. They don't have a gym at the Whitehouse?


liberal logic -




Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -




TERRORISTS - Some of them don't wear turbans.




IF GUNS CAUSE CRIME - Do wedding rings cause spousal abuse?


TAGS: lib logic fail
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by JGalt

RonaldReagan - July 19, 2015, 2:25 am
The bump on the back of my head after too many trips to wrong website when she walks by could attest to this


Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -




Hypocrisy -




GITMO GETS $744K SOCCER FIELD - LIAR ONCE AGAIN President Obama issued an executive order 1-22-2009 requiring that the Guantanamo Bay detention facility be closed within a year.




NDAA -


TAGS: see you in gitmo
Rating: 3.3/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

foxrecon19d - January 10, 2013, 12:25 am
Citation?


The Socialist & The Race Pimp -




HECKOFAJOB BARACKI - You Remind Me Of Jimmy Carter




WIND TURBINES - they're such a blight on the landscape


TAGS: illogical rhetoric from the hypocright
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

Renza - February 25, 2013, 11:26 am
I blame the fact that they typically don't use facts for their arguments.
crankyhead - February 24, 2013, 2:55 pm
Yep, there's quite a few easily dismantled arguments coming from the anti-environmentalists these days.
Cyberhagen - February 24, 2013, 12:29 pm
Yeah, I never quite understood that argument. It's like my wife who doesn't want satellite TV because of that "ugly dish"; yet she had no issue growing up with the old TV antennae on everyone's roof?


Liberal Logic -


TAGS: liberal logic confederate flag jay carney soviet propaganda posters communist dukes of hazzard racism bigotry hypocrisy
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - July 3, 2015, 3:34 am
the confederate flag is being a**ociated with racism because racism is indefensible, and they cant allow the people to have a well-known symbol of rebellion against government. soviet propaganda on the other hand fits very well with the current regime


LIBERALS TAKE VOTER ID LAW TO U.N. - Because who better else to help strike down a law than those who are experts at rigging elections and committing voter fraud!




White Lives Matter -




LIBERALS - Sunspot activity is directly related to global temperature cycles. Next please explain how C02 emmissions on Earth affect sunspot activity. Thanks




Clinton Corruption -




LIBERAL LOGIC 101 - guns kill people, spoons make you fat, hard-working people are greedy, etc




BRIDES AGAINST OBAMA - Because the Obama-Biden Gift Registry is well....TACKY!




FACTUAL TRUTH - "Separation of church and state" is NOT in the Constitution. It is a liberal lie. Read it agian, fools.




LIBERAL LOGIC - Defies Reasoning


TAGS: lib logic fail
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by JGalt

crankyhead - November 19, 2012, 5:19 pm
Well, JG, you're the guy who brought up Brad Pitt, so, there's always that, right?
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 7:01 am
only one brad pitt- gee how does it feel when someone puts words in your mouth for a change! you do it all the time to other...hmmm
crankyhead - November 19, 2012, 12:40 am
Those are your words and thoughts JG, they aren't mine.
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 12:35 am
Punked!
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 12:35 am
Brad Pitt does not turn me on like he does you!
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
How many succesful CFO's are there in the world JG? There's only one Brad Pitt. Just sayin'.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 8:53 pm
Gee Crankykopf, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital sounds like more of a success than failure- not which you describe.... leave it to liberals to amplify the minutia.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 8:42 pm
you played into my hands cracky! When a CFO can deliver the sales/marketing and performance, isn't it the same thing? OH NO, its probably not... lets hear it from the left the loony logic of how corporate America does not deserve Hollyweird pay scales.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:37 pm
... other reason than this?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:36 pm
Sure, Bain had some successes. They also have a track record of purchasing companies they had no intention of saving, giving themselves enormous payouts, and then putting people out of work. Do you really think that Romney lost the election for any...
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:34 pm
Check out the pay structure at Hostess then tell me if it's the union or the executives who are bankrupting it.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:33 pm
Can your brother put b***s in the seats the same way that Brad Pitt does? No. Can your brotehers appearance on a screen guarantee that the theatre will generate enough revenue to pay it's staffs wages? No.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:45 pm
selective outrage from the left! Hmmmm
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:44 pm
in 1-2 minutes of film where Some of the big name actors make several thousand times more per minute in a film????
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:42 pm
And before you start on salaries- crickets chirping when Brad Pitt and other leftist actors makes $20 million for appearing in a 90 minute film....yet liberals only see corporate officers as greedy! Why does my brother only make a couple of hundred dollar
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:40 pm
companies. Its a rebirthing process, and its funny how liberals excoriate this healthy process... yet we hear the crickets chirping when unions kill Hostess bakeries.... hypocrisy from the left!
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:38 pm
Through this process, having been bought by financial holding companies. In some cases, they merge them with similar companies, combine product lines, eliminate what does not make money and in some cases, subdivisions get spun off and sold to other
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:37 pm
that's funny how you call it that. They rescued a lot of companies, Bain did not have a perfect track record, but for every company you name that eventually went bankrupt 2 or more succeeded due to Bain. I have a lot of suppliers who have been
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 1:00 pm
I can't wait to see what distraction you come up with for this one.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:44 pm
So, no proof then? Just more empty accusations? Good job arnnatz.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:21 pm
Wow, I suppose you don't have any proof for this accusation either?
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 12:05 pm
how original, but considering that your postings are almost exclusively headlines from Daily KOS, I expected nothing less from you
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:54 am
TRANSLATION: I can't read, so I didn't see ***** from ********** who those comments were in response to. But my inflated ego make me think everyone is responding to me.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:53 am
I don't see it anywhere in that article you provided arnnatz.
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 11:52 am
was that comment aimed at me or cranky?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:52 am
Or are we supposed to use republican logic now, and just ignore the existence of this poster?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:51 am
JG, didn't you just smugly point to Romney and use him as your example for why logic defies the liberal mind, selectively ignoring his track record of bankrupting american companies?
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 10:56 am
just saying that his pointing to Romney is like the pot calling the kettle cookware... so stop being so smug and selective in your crtiticisms.
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 9:32 am
You might want to try reading before you post: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/14/business/government-ownership-and-gm-regulation-dont-mix.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 1:09 am
Obama sits on the board at GM? News to me...
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 12:43 am
Obama's bailout of GM resulted in massive outsourcing to China. Why so selectively blind to facts?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:36 am
*employed*
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:36 am
Republican logic: Ignore Romney's track record of outsourcing and vulture capitalism and hold him up against millionaires who have actually employ other Americans.


LIBERAL THEOLOGY - If you pay taxes, you fund war, therefore you cannot get into heaven. Obama's apostle Michael Moore teaches us this.




REPUBLICAN LOGIC -




TURKEYS - Look, they're both smiling.




LIBERALS - Flinging crap when they get upset... its what they do!




LET'S MOVE! - Wide load, coming through!




FACES OF EVIL - Remember the Cold War It's coming again




NEWT GINGRICH - PROOF OF EVOLUTION




RYAN & ROMNEY SUPPORT RAPIST RIGHTS OVER WOMEN - Women have a way of shutting down things, like your chances this November.




Liberal Logic: Killing Babies Is Good, Killing Terrorists Is Bad -




ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS - LIBERAL LOGIC: Believing the LIES and ignoring the FACTS!


TAGS: obama liar liberal lies logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by spyderlady

KALKAM - October 28, 2012, 10:48 pm
yep....http://www.hulu.com/watch/409925


POLITICS -




The Apex of Liberal Hypocrisy -




Liberal Logic -




OBAMA'S FAILURE - Yeah, he owns this one- Massive Fail as we head toward a second dip. This one has his name written all over it, and he can't blame anyone but his own regime.




MITT ROMNEY: - November: Job creator vs Community Agitator!




" CHANGE " - U.S. Debt Held by Public Tops $10T for 1st Time—Up 59 Percent Under Obama. 61% of it—is owned by foreign interests




RYAN: DEFENDS A RAPIST'S RIGHT TO HAVE KIDS 'THEIR' WAY - Brought to you by the Republicans on the committee Re-elect Obama




PRAYER IN SCHOOL - Be careful what you wish for, Religious Right.


TAGS: religious right
Rating: 1.92/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

simplegenius - December 5, 2012, 1:34 pm
at least pagans, witches and satanists don't necessarily believe they must murder people of other religions. a sacrifice is one person not thousands and usually someone with the same beliefs as them.


PETA Insanity -




NEWT GINGRICH - for president




The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations -




NEWT GINGRICH - Bringing big government to the moon...and beyond!




THE MODERN "PROGRESSIVES" -




MEDIA SPLATTERS -




Liberal Lunacy Beyond Parody -




REMIND ME AGAIN 'WHO WON?' - The ONLY response that needs to given to ignorant Republicans any time they open their BIG, FAT, RACIST, LOSER mouths ...OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS!




Obamanation -




JOHN ADAMS - "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."




Government screwed up healthcare -




Obamacare. Unfortunately now we know what's in it. -




LOGIC DICTATES -




rigging election -




Liberal Science Deniers -




GARY BUSEY - Endorses Newt Gingrich




THEY SAID IT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN - In Germany, they came for the Jews. In 2012, they went after the Christians. Obama is attacking religious institutions, making them provide abortions and other things against their beliefs


TAGS: religious persecution wake up america
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by JGalt

RonaldReagan - February 14, 2014, 1:38 pm
When is he going to get that ugly wart removed? Me***hor. He's a wart on the nation.


LIBERAL LOGIC - No wonder we're in the shape we're in. Yes, lie-berals really are that stupid




BARACK OBAMA - AMERICANS ARE UNITING THIS NOVEMBER TO TELL YOU ONE THING




FREE RIDE -




GODWIN'S LAW - There, I said it, ...But it was ok when Bush was president to make Nazi references




GUN CONTROL LAWS - Simplified


TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - January 20, 2013, 8:24 pm
thank-Q 1 point sniper for proving liberals are dunces!


TEACH A MAN TO FISH -




BUDGET DEFICIT - At least we're not "Broke-Broke"




RELIGIOUS FREEDOM - It's for everyone.


TAGS: religious freedom flying spaghetti monster
Rating: 3.33/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - February 25, 2013, 9:06 am
True, they wouldn't need tax exemption until they made it a more centralized organization. I could see them having enough support to get it recognized at least to the point of allowing the religious hat.
PapaFox - February 25, 2013, 8:48 am
I don't think they have any Flying Spaghetti Monster Cathedrals just yet. :)
ipaprime - February 25, 2013, 7:48 am
so does the IRS say your tax exempt yet?


OLD POSTER - Continuous hypocrisy of the Religious right.




CONSERVATIVE LOGIC 102 -




LOGIC - Definitely not a tenant of Conservatism.




ISRAELI OFFICIAL TEARS UP BIBLE - Michael Ben Ari, an Israeli Right-wing lawmaker tears up 'abominable' book sent to him by a Christian organization & throws it in trash bin


TAGS: zionists israel religion bible devil
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by SethMythrax

GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:18 pm
amazing
starryeyedguy - September 17, 2012, 10:56 am
And?
freasy - September 17, 2012, 9:16 am
So what, his perogative


CHRISTIANITY? - "The Almighty is very central in the life of my family. We attend prayer meetings at the Mosque, I mean Church, regularly."




GIVING AWAY THE FARM - because there is not much else left, is there?




Crazy Commiefornia Environmentalists -


TAGS: liberal logic california delta smelt epa democrat created dust bowl san joaquin valley nancy pelosi barbara boxer governor moonbeam jerry brown radical environmentalists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 22, 2015, 7:27 pm

The boss is just trying some stuff out.
rebeccaolsen - April 22, 2015, 12:24 pm
It is just me or does everything look different than before? Makeover? Did politifake get a facelift?


Liberal America -




Liberal Hypocrisy -




Liberal Science Deniers -




PRINTING MORE MONEY DIDN'T WORK.. - So now we need to print more money! (Liberal logic in a nutshell)


TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - September 10, 2012, 6:48 am
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/09/15290-case-closed-if-moderate-voters-see-this-video-its-over-for-obama/
Bull - September 9, 2012, 11:08 pm
I think we need to go back to the way it used to be when we backed up our currency with gold. (though I've got to admit I don't really understand much about currency) Wasn't that guy one of those private sector douches? Yeah, fire his ...
WTFO - September 9, 2012, 10:46 pm
This guy needs to be fired, period.


Phone Registration -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


OOOPS! BUSTED!! -




those selfish democrats -




OBAMA LOGIC -




2 STARBUCKS IN STARBUCKS DRINKING STARBUCKS - Liberal arguments are like this photo- cute, trendy, nostalgic, but largely irrelevant to the topic at hand.




LIBERAL LOGIC - even their tin foil hats can't protect them




LIBERAL LOGIC - They support the Secretary of Treasury and Senators with their tax violations, but are against tax breaks for the rich. Go figure.




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE